Welcome, Guest! Please log in.

Noel Clarke Loses L…
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Sticky] Noel Clarke Loses Libel Case Against The Guardian as Sexual Misconduct Allegations Ruled Substantially True

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
6 Views
Posts: 23
Admin
Topic starter
Member
Joined: 1 month ago
Acclaimed actor, writer, and director Noel Clarke, best known for Kidulthood and Doctor Who, has failed in his defamation claim

 

Noel Clarke Loses Libel Case Against The Guardian as Sexual Misconduct Allegations Ruled ‘Substantially True’

Acclaimed actor, writer, and director Noel Clarke, best known for Kidulthood and Doctor Who, has failed in his defamation claim against Guardian News and Media (GNM). The lawsuit was brought after the paper published multiple reports in 2021, featuring allegations of sexual misconduct made by more than 20 women who had worked with him in a professional capacity.

The 49-year-old strongly denied all claims of wrongdoing, insisting the coverage was inaccurate and damaging to his career. However, Mrs Justice Steyn ruled in the High Court that GNM had successfully defended the case, relying on the defences of truth and public interest.

Judge’s Findings

The court examined eight separate publications, all of which were found to carry meanings that were “substantially true.”

While acknowledging parts of Clarke’s testimony, Justice Steyn ultimately described him as “not a credible or reliable witness.” She also dismissed the suggestion that over 20 women would conspire to lie in court, calling it “inherently implausible.”

From the evidence heard, the judge concluded that “women have been speaking about their experiences of working with Mr Clarke for many years.”

Journalists and Guardian Response

Lucy Osborne and Sirin Kale, who led The Guardian’s investigation, welcomed the ruling, stating they had always stood by their reporting. Osborne added:
“This kind of behaviour still exists in the film and TV industry, and I hope this judgment encourages more women to speak out.”

Guardian editor-in-chief Katharine Viner described the verdict as “a deserved victory for the women who suffered because of Noel Clarke’s behaviour.” She further said the judgment stood as “a landmark moment for investigative journalism in Britain.”

Clarke’s Reaction

Following the ruling, Clarke expressed disappointment and maintained that he was unfairly portrayed:
“I have never claimed to be perfect, but I am not the person described in these articles. Overnight I lost everything.”

The actor also thanked the witnesses who supported him and his family for standing by his side.

Trial Background

The trial, held between March and April 2025, heard detailed accounts from women who accused Clarke of inappropriate behaviour, including groping, sharing explicit images without consent, and exposing himself. Clarke gave evidence over several days, at times breaking down as he described how the investigation had “smashed” his life.

His legal team argued he had been made a “scapegoat” during the post-#MeToo era when the film industry was attempting to address systemic misconduct.

However, Guardian lawyers countered that the reporting was “careful, thorough, and conscientious.”

In 2022, police had confirmed that Clarke would not face criminal charges. Nevertheless, the Guardian’s investigation led to major consequences for him, including BAFTA suspending his membership just weeks after awarding him the prize for Outstanding British Contribution to Cinema.